contractors insurance

Travelers Institute Partners with Small Business California to Advocate for Small Businesses and Identify Solutions to Complex Challenges

 

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 20, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) — The Travelers Institute, the public policy division of The Travelers Companies, Inc. TRV +3.89% , today announced the results of its California small business survey, in which more than two out of three Bay Area entrepreneurs, policy makers and community leaders surveyed feel that small business is more heavily impacted by government regulation than their larger counterparts. The results were revealed at the Travelers Institute’s “Small Business, Big Opportunity” symposium, which convened San Francisco small business leaders at the historic Merchants Exchange Building, an emblem of the city’s economic significance, to identify solutions to business challenges.

At the event, panelists discussed detailed survey findings in which employee benefit matters (61 percent) and cash flow (60 percent) were cited as the top challenges facing small businesses in California. Participants also discussed the Travelers Institute’s white paper, which advocates for greater awareness of small business issues through legislative action to reduce regulatory burdens and offers tips for business continuity and risk management planning.

“Travelers is committed to helping small businesses succeed and influencing public policy leaders to improve the business environment,” said Joan Woodward, Travelers Executive Vice President of Public Policy, who also heads the Travelers Institute. “Small businesses are the backbone of our economy, and we understand it is essential to have state and federal policies that encourage entrepreneurship and fuel job creation in San Francisco and across the country.”

In addition to Woodward, who moderated the panel, program participants included several high-profile San Francisco small business leaders including:

– Christine Baker, Acting Director, California Department of Industrial Relations

– Elizabeth Echols, Regional Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration

– Regina Dick Endrizzi, Director, San Francisco Office of Small Business

– Scott Hauge, President, Small Business California

– Al Nelson, Regional Vice President, Small Commercial — California Region, Travelers

“Businesses, especially small ones, need encouragement to expand and create jobs, ultimately stimulating the local economy. This requires appropriate access to both resources and capital, and limiting burdensome regulations that stifle growth,” said Scott Hauge, an insurance executive who also runs the entrepreneurial advocacy group Small Business California, which co-hosted the event. “Through its series of small business symposia, the Travelers Institute highlights many of the very obstacles facing entrepreneurs in San Francisco, and we are proud to partner with them to address and solve these challenges.”

At the symposium, panelists discussed the issues of disaster preparedness and business continuity planning as critical to business success. The American Red Cross has data that shows as many as 40 percent of small businesses do not reopen after a disaster, and according to a national Travelers Institute survey conducted in March, more than half of all small business owners surveyed do not have a business continuity plan.*

“As one of the largest insurers of small businesses in the country, we strongly advocate for business continuity planning and risk management,” said Al Nelson, Travelers Regional Vice President of Small Commercial. “We’ve seen firsthand what can happen when entrepreneurs aren’t prepared for disaster.” Nelson added that many business owners consider business continuity planning a competitive advantage, recognizing that an entrepreneur’s reputation and livelihood are at stake if they can’t meet the needs of their customers.

The key findings of the Travelers Institute California survey discussed at the symposium include:

– 71 percent of respondents feel the national, state and local economies are in poor condition. The majority feel it will be the same or worse next year. There is more pessimism among small business owners in California regarding the economy compared to the national sentiment overall, based on a similar national survey conducted by the Travelers Institute.

– Employee benefit matters (61 percent) and cash flow (60 percent) are cited as the top business challenges facing small businesses in California.

– 51 percent cite state/local regulation and 35 percent cite federal regulation as business challenges.

– 50 percent say employment regulations are the most difficult to comply with, followed by health insurance mandates (47 percent).

– The majority (65 percent) feel that small business is more heavily impacted by government regulation than big business.

– More than 4-in-10 feel that government regulation negatively impacts the ability of small businesses to hire new employees and grow business.

Methodology: The survey polled 129 Travelers Institute symposium attendees in conjunction with Small Business California members. The poll was conducted online from 9/20/2011 — 10/7/2011 and respondents included a mix of business owners and principals from small sized firms, as well as policy makers and community leaders in the San Francisco area.

The Travelers Institute has additional forums planned in select markets throughout the remainder of the year to bring stakeholders together to discuss ways to create better operating climates for small businesses. For more information, visit www.travelersinstitute.com .

About the Travelers Institute The Travelers Institute, the public policy division of The Travelers Companies, Inc., engages in discussion and analysis of public policy topics of importance to the insurance marketplace and the financial services industry. The Travelers Institute draws upon the industry expertise of Travelers’ senior management and the technical expertise of many of Travelers’ underwriters, risk managers and other experts to provide information and analysis to public policy makers and regulators. Travelers is a leading provider of property casualty insurance for auto, home and business. For more information, visit www.travelers.com .

About Small Business California Small Business California is a proactive, non-partisan business advocate whose only agenda is the well-being of California’s 3.2 million small businesses. Working for all small businesses for a better business environment, SB-Cal is responsive to the needs of small business owners.

* Based on data collected through a national Travelers Institute survey of small business leaders conducted in early 2011.

SOURCE: The Travelers Companies, Inc.

Need assistance with contractors insurance or business insurance ? Get a Tavelers quote today. Call us at 818-348-6106

Are Your Subcontractors Insured Under Your General Liability Insurance Policy?

Most businesses and consumers assume that subcontractors that are hired on behalf of a business are covered under that business’s general liability and workers compensation policies. This is most often not the case.

Most general liability policies contain a subcontractor exclusion. The subcontractor exclusion clause excludes coverage that is caused by a subcontractor. In such cases the business that is hiring the subcontractor must protect itself from damages that can be caused by the subcontractor that was hired to do the work. The best way for a business to protect itself from damages caused by a subcontractor is to make sure that the subcontractor has adequet coverage. There are two steps that must be taken. First, the company must request to become an additional insured on the subcontractors general liability policy. The second step is to request a copy of the subcontractors policy to make sure that the terms, conditions and exclusions of the subcontractors policy are acceptable to the business that is subbing the work out. After all, what good is it to be an additional insured on a policy that carries every exclusion under the sun? The terms, conditions and exclusions of a policy are not disclosed on the additional insured certificate and the business that subbed the work out will not know this information untill there is an uncoved claim. By this time, its too late.

Don’t let this happen to you. Check your policy to make sure you and your customers are properly protected against damage or injury.

Need assistance with contractors insurance or business insurance ? Call us at 818-348-6106

Don’t Hire An Unlicensed And Uninsured Contractor

SACRAMENTO —The Contractors State License Board (CSLB) wants consumers in smaller communities and rural areas of the state to know that they’re especially vulnerable to becoming victimized by unlicensed contractors. Last week CSLB’s Statewide Investigative Fraud Team (SWIFT) investigators teamed with the Kern County Sheriffs and District Attorney Offices, and the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement to conduct a sting in the city of Ridgecrest.
The operation, conducted on February 3, 2011, led to the arrest of eight suspected unlicensed operators. CSLB investigators posed as homeowners and invited suspected phony contractors to a newly constructed home near Pearson Park. Investigators asked for bids that included landscaping, fencing, and painting. If the bid totaled more than $500 in labor and materials and the suspect was not state-licensed, they were arrested. Eight were given a Notice to Appear (NTA) in court to face misdemeanor charges of contracting without a license; some also face charges of illegal advertising, and soliciting an excessive down payment, also misdemeanors. All eight will face a charge of failing to secure workers’ compensation insurance for employees. They are scheduled to appear in Kern County Superior Court in Ridgecrest on March 29, 2011.
“This sting is a perfect example of why homeowners need to make sure the contractor they hire is properly licensed and insured. It only takes a minute to check information on the CSLB website at www.cslb.ca.gov or www.CheckTheLicenseFirst.com,” said CSLB Registrar Steve Sands. “If someone working on your property is injured and is not covered by workers’ compensation insurance, they could turn around and sue you for their medical bills.”
By law, anyone performing home improvement services that total more than $500 in material and labor must be licensed by the state of California. Contractors must include their CSLB license number in all advertisements and contracts. Those who are not licensed can only perform jobs valued at $500 or less. Their ad must state that they are not licensed.
CSLB received critical support for this operation from one of its legitimate licensed contractors. Four of the eight arrested during last week’s sting operation were the result of leads from that licensee.
Licensees face the difficult task of competing against those who break the law by operating in the multi-billion dollar underground economy. In addition, the loss of tax revenue takes money away from schools and law enforcement.
“Homeowners should also know that they have little recourse against an unlicensed operator if something goes wrong with a project,” added Sands. “That’s especially true if you give them a big down payment and they never show up to start the job.” CSLB offers a variety of free services, including mediation and arbitration, for consumers who have a problem with their licensed contractor.
CSLB urges all California consumers to follow these tips before hiring a home improvement contractor:
• Be especially hesitant when approached by someone offering home improvement services door-to-door.
• Verify the contractor’s license online at www.cslb.ca.gov or www.CheckTheLicenseFirst.com, or via CSLB’s automated phone system at 1-800-321-CSLB (2752).
• Ask to see a photo identification to verify the contractor’s identity.
• Don’t pay more than 10% down or $1,000, whichever is less. There is an exception to this rule for about two dozen contractors who purchase special bonds and are noted on CSLB’s website.
• Don’t pay in cash, and don’t let the payments get ahead of the work.
• Get at least three bids and insist on a written contract before your project begins.
The Contractors State License Board operates under the umbrella of the California Department of Consumer Affairs. More information and publications about hiring contractors are available on the CSLB website or by calling 800-321-CSLB (2752).

Contractors, need assistance with contractors insurance or business insurance for any industry? Call us at 818-348-6106

New Contractors Insurance Product Now Available

New contractors insurance programs are available for contractors of all sizes and types. Read the rest of this entry »

How To Get A General Liability Insurance Quote

Some advise and tips on how to get a general liability quote for contractors insurance Read the rest of this entry »

Contractors Insurance Requirements Delay Gulf Oil Clean Up Efforts

Contractors are having a difficult time fulfilling the federal governments stiff insurance requirements. Read the rest of this entry »

California and Nevada Contractors Make Employees Become Independant Contractors In An Attemp Get Cheap Contractors Insurance Costs

Contractors make employees become independent contractors to try to lower their contractors insurance premiums. Read the rest of this entry »

Contractors Insurance – Beware of prices that are too good to be true.

As the economic climate becomes more hostile towards remodeling contractors and new home builders the need to save money on contractor’s insurance coverage increases. However, contractors need to be well aware of what it is they might be giving up to get that low price. Insurance brokers have several ways of lowering the cost of your contractor’s insurance costs. However, they are also lowering coverages and thereby the level of protection that your business has against claims for property damage, bodily injury, construction defect, or any other claim that might arise.

In this article I will introduce the concept of the sunset clause, the manifestation clause and the money saving risk retention group policy. These are three options that may save you a bundle of money now but can cost you your business later. Unfortunately, when competing for the sale some insurance brokers are willing to sell you anything just to get the business. Always ask your insurance broker if the policy you are purchasing contains one or both of these clauses or if it is being offered by a risk retention group.

The sunset clause limits the time that a claim can be filed after the policy expiration date. For example, a general contractor has liability over his operations for ten years after the projects completion. A sunset clause would limit the ability to file a claim to however many years the clause stipulates. So a policy with a three year sunset clause would limit the insurance company’s liability to the said amount of time. That does not mean that the general contractor is absolved of the liability for the remainder of the ten year term. The contractor is still responsible no matter what deal he cut with his insurance company.

The manifestation clause limits claims to be filed within the policy year or a short time thereafter. The manifestation clause says that the damage being claimed had to have manifested itself or shown itself to the average person during the time of the policy or the stipulated time period. If the damage was not seen or noticed during the designated time period the claim will not be covered. Again, this leaves the contractor holding the bag for any damages that he may be liable for.

The sunset clause and manifestation clause can be written into the policy separately or together. Used alone or together the insurance company limits their liability so severely that the policy becomes virtually worthless. All this for a savings of usually just a few % of the annual premium.

The third way that insurance brokers sneak one over on the client in an unethical attempt to get the lowest quote possible is with a policy offered by a risk retention group. I don’t care how safe your insurance broker told you risk retention groups are they are not safe at all. Purchasing your insurance coverage from a risk retention group is not a financially sound decision. There are several issues with Risk Retention Groups. The two that I find most dangerous are a) the fact that they are not under the authority of any State Department of Insurance and b) there is no guarantee of funds being available in case of a claim. There is no remedy for the insured if the company is dissolved. These are not minor problems if you ask me. The fact that RRG’s are not under State DOI authority lends them to playing by their own rules often times. I have seen this in the underwriting stage, in the policy servicing stage and in the claim process. Even when an insured files a complaint with the DOI, the RRG cannot be compelled to act. Once a business buys this type of coverage they are opening up a can of worms that may very well come back to haunt them.

While there are several safe ways to save money on your business insurance these are not some of the ways that I would recommend. Although I am addressing contractors in this article this information is important to anyone who is purchasing business insurance no matter what their industry. Ask your broker to put all the terms, conditions and exclusions of the policy that you are about to purchase in writing on a formal proposal. Make sure to read the entire proposal and make it a point to understand the insurance proposal thoroughly. If there is any part of it that you do not understand take the time to ask your broker. That is what he or she is there for. Also, make sure that the name and rating of the insurance company is noted on the proposal. This will enable you to make sure that you are purchasing coverage from a reputable carrier that has a good reputation and is going to stand behind you and your business at the moment of truth. If you still don’t feel like you are getting the coverages you need for a reasonable price shop around. Call a broker that specializes in the type of coverage that you are looking for. It is your right as a consumer to get the best coverage that your money can buy.

Need assistance with contractors insurance or business insurance for any industry? Call us at 818-348-6106

Contractor’s Insurance: Builder’s Risk vs. Course of Construction

what is the difference between course of construction and builders risk? Read the rest of this entry »

Owner Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIPs): Why Owners Like Them and Why Contractors May Not

Wrap-Up policies AKA Owner Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIPs) are becoming a standard feature in the construction insurance industry. Insurance brokers have heavily marketed OCIPs to owners, promising cost savings.

The programs, initially, are simple and attractive. The project owner buys insurance for all the participants in a construction project. The owner then requires the participants to reduce their price by eliminating all of their insurance costs in exchange for owner-provided coverage. The owner expects to save money by discount-purchasing of insurance and by avoiding contractor markups on contractors insurance costs. A single insurance carrier on the risk for claims can result in more efficient and less expensive claim resolution.  One carrier for all the projects needs is also easier to deal with from an administrative point of view as opposed to multiple policies. This promise is what sells Wrap-Up policy.

In reality this policy is way more complicated than it appears initially. General contractors and subcontractors need to be cautious when participating in an OCIP project. They must ensure that the coverage offered by the OCIP is sufficient to replace their existing insurance coverage. They also must be careful that the “bid deduct” process by which the cost of insurance is deducted from their price is properly and timely performed.

Each OCIP is designed for a specific owner’s needs for a specific project. The following overview of OCIPs is based on general practices. The OCIP documents must be carefully reviewed and considered for each project.


What Is A Wrap- Up Policy AKA Owner Controlled Insurance Program?

In an OCIP, the owner purchases insurance for other participants in a construction project. OCIPs also are sometimes called “wrap-ups.” An OCIP will cover the owner, contractor and subcontractors. An OCIP also may include design professionals. The coverage can include general liability insurance (CGL), builder’s risk, worker’s compensation insurance, design errors and omissions as well as excess, umbrella and other special coverages.

The coverage provided by an OCIP is summarized in a document known as the “OCIP Manual.” The OCIP Manual also should describe the bid-deduct process, claims management and safety requirements. This important document should be made a part of any bid solicitation and of ultimate contract documents. The “OCIP Administrator” administers the OCIP program. The OCIP Administrator acts as an agent of the owner and usually is supplied by the broker that set up the OCIP Program.

Those who benefit from the OCIP must give the owner credit for this insurance coverage. This is the bid deduct process. There are two basic methods for the bid deduct process. In one, the owner can ask that all interested contractors and subcontractors provide a price for the work which excludes insurance. Each proposal must be reviewed by the OCIP Administrator to determine whether the price accurately reflects the elimination of contractor insurance costs. This can be a time-consuming process. In the second approach, all interested contractors and subcontractors are asked to submit proposals that include insurance costs. When the contract is awarded, the OCIP Administrator will calculate a deductive change order for the successful contractor’s and subcontractors’ insurance costs. This second method, which appears to be more popular, requires that only successful proposals be reviewed for a deduction of insurance costs.

Public and private owners first began to use OICPs on large-scale projects ($100 million or more). The use of OCIPs on smaller projects ($50 million or more) is increasing as owner, broker and insurer expertise with OCIPs grows. On smaller projects, the additional administrative cost generally makes it less worthwhile to use OCIPs.

But, there is an exception. Owners and developers have begun to use OCIPs for construction of condominium and other multi-residential projects, even those costing less than $50 million. Defect claims by homeowner associations have plagued such projects for decades and have made it extremely difficult to insure such construction. Many contractors and subcontractors are unable to insure these projects at almost any price. The answer is the OCIP. It may be the only way such a project can be constructed in today’s insurance market.


Why Would a Project Owner Choose an OCIP?

Traditionally, an owner accepts the economic risk of a project but seeks to avoid the construction risk. An owner typically would retain a design team or a design-build contractor to be responsible for design and a general contractor or design-build contractor to be responsible for constructing the project for a fixed price or a guaranteed maximum price. An owner-developer also would use surety bonds, insurance and contractual indemnity provisions to further insulate itself from construction risk.

An OCIP changes this approach. The owner becomes responsible for insuring the project and for administering loss prevention programs and becomes exposed to the risk of increased premiums for unexpected losses. In exchange for this new risk, the owner hopes to obtain cost savings.


The Pro’s of purchasing an OCIP

Cost savings are the primary advantage of an OCIP. The owner-developer always indirectly bears the cost of insurance on a construction project. The design consultants, contractor, subcontractors and other parties involved in the project, in pricing their work, pass through the cost of insurance plus a markup. Insurers and brokers assert that an owner can save from 0.5 to 2 percent of total construction costs by using an OCIP. The savings come from: (1) the elimination of contractor mark-up on insurance costs; and (2) the ability to obtain insurance at a lower cost than contractors, subcontractors and others can obtain it.

An OCIP also can provide increased coverage limits. The typical contractor or subcontractor has liability coverage in the $1 million to $2 million range. OCIP liability limits may be $5 million for primary coverage, with additional excess coverage. OCIP coverage may be broader than that available to contractors. In some cases, such as condominium projects, contractors may not be able to obtain coverage at all. OCIP coverage also is uniform. While contractors and subcontractors usually provide certificates of insurance evidencing coverage limits, the specific endorsements and limitations of their particular policies may not be disclosed. It also is possible that a contractor’s or subcontractor’s policy limits have been depleted by payments on claims on other projects.

A key part of OCIPs is a uniform risk management program. The OCIP Administrator has overall responsibility for safety and loss control on the project. The OCIP Administrator also will handle claims. This centralized management, in theory, can result in cost savings from improved safety, increased loss control and more efficient claims handling.


The Disadvantages of an OCIP

The promise of cost savings may be illusory. Administration of an OCIP will impose new, additional costs on the owner. The owner, through its OCIP Administrator, becomes responsible for safety and claims management on the project. The OCIP Administrator will need to administer the bid-deduct process. The actual experience of owners suggests that the promised cost savings of an OCIP may not always be fully realized.

The insurance premium/loss risk is shifted from the contractor and subcontractors to the owner. The owner may be exposed to the risk of premium increases if labor costs and loss experiences exceed estimates. But, it also is possible that an owner will benefit from premium rebates if claims are less than anticipated.

Under an OCIP, it may be more difficult to manage the performance of contractors and subcontractors that have insurance-related claims. For example, a subcontractor with an insurance claim for damaged work may wait for the owner’s OCIP Administrator to settle the claim before repairing the work. It may be more difficult for the owner to enforce contractual obligations to repair the work and proceed before disputes are resolved when the subcontractor asserts that the owner’s OCIP Administrator is delaying adjustment of the claim.

An OCIP also may discourage bidders. Contractors and subcontractors may be hesitant to bid on the project because they are unfamiliar with OCIPs. Potential bidders may have concerns about unfair calculations of credits for insurance costs during the bid deduct process, about uncompensated overhead resulting from new administrative responsibilities for the OCIP and about loss of mark-up on insurance costs.

What Coverage’s Does an OCIP Provide?

Who is covered?

OCIP coverage will include the owner and the general contractor. Coverage also will include subcontractors but may limit coverage to subcontractors with contract values over a certain amount, such as $25,000. In that case, subcontractors with contracts for less than $25,000 should be required to provide certificates of insurance. Coverage also may be limited to those providing direct labor to the construction site. Therefore, material suppliers typically are not covered. “Furnish and Install” subcontractors that furnish materials but that subcontract out installation also may not be covered.


What is covered?

OCIP coverage will be tailored specifically to the project. In general, coverage will include worker’s compensation/employer’s liability, general liability (CGL) and builder’s risk property insurance. Coverage generally is limited to operations at the project site during construction. The OCIP typically will not provide coverage for off-site operations, including work and transportation, and for post-completion on-site work, such as warranty work. Accordingly, contractors and subcontractors must be required to provide proof of insurance by their own carriers for non-covered activities.

OCIP programs also offer excess or umbrella coverage. Less commonly, an OCIP will provide for design errors and omissions coverage. Such coverage is included when the design professionals are included in OCIP coverage. Such coverage, however, also will be necessary for contractors to the extent that any portion of their scope is design-build.

OCIP coverage generally does not include surety bonds. An OCIP may include subcontractor default insurance, however.


Contract Issues

The existence of an OCIP does not eliminate the need to provide for contractual indemnity by the contractor. An owner should include a broad indemnity clause in the construction contract as a second basis of protection from loss.

If the construction contract provides for alternative dispute resolution, such as arbitration, the owner-developer should seek to bind the broker/OCIP Administrator and insurance company with the same provision. This will ensure that all necessary parties will be involved in any insurance-related dispute. If the broker and/or insurer refuse to agree to ADR, the owner should consider deleting the ADR provision from the construction contract.


What an OCIP Means to the General Contractor and Subcontractors

When an owner implements an OCIP, participation is mandatory for the contractor and subcontractors. While OCIPs often are touted as having benefits, these benefits usually accrue to the owner. An OCIP imposes real risks to and expenses on contractors and subcontractors, and they must be carefully managed.

The contractor must carefully review the OCIP Manual before submitting pricing. OCIPs commonly require the contractor to submit pricing with the cost of insurance included. The contractor then must complete an OCIP Enrollment Form to become eligible for the OCIP. Once the OCIP insurance is issued, the cost of the contractor’s insurance is deducted from the contractor’s pricing.


The Benefits of an OCIP to a General Contractor or Subcontractor

An OCIP may provide greater limits for primary and excess or umbrella coverage than the contractor’s or the subcontractors’ regular policy. This may prove beneficial in resolving defect claims. In addition, because a single carrier insures all of the participants in a project, claims resolution may be easier.

An OCIP also may allow a contractor to engage in work that it may not otherwise be able to obtain. Many contractors and subcontractors cannot take work involving multi-family residential structures. Such projects have been plagued by claims and lawsuits for years, and as a result, such work usually is excluded from insurance coverage. An OCIP provided by the owner-developer may be the only way a condominium project can be constructed with insurance.


The Disadvantages of an OCIP to a General Contractor or Subcontractor

The three major disadvantages of an OCIP are: (1) possible gaps in coverage; (2) OCIP deductions that exceed actual insurance cost savings, and (3) uncompensated administrative costs.

The prudent contractor must do more than review the OCIP Manual for a summary of the coverage provided. The contractor should request copies of the OCIP policies and have the policies reviewed by the contractor’s broker or attorney for the coverage they offer. This is especially true for general liability and builder’s risk policies, which can vary significantly between policies. Critical liability insurance issues include whether the policy provides “broad form” coverage, how long the “completed operations” coverage continues and what exclusions are included.

The contractor must carefully review and complete the OCIP Enrollment Form. The format of OCIP Enrollment Forms varies. The form must be carefully scrutinized to ensure that it allows the contractor to show its true cost of insurance. If all discounts and credits are not reflected, the OCIP deduct will exceed the true cost of the insurance.

If the contractor has any flat-rate premiums, this should be carefully noted. The OCIP deduct should not include any flat-rate premiums because the contractor is unlikely to receive credit from its insurer for the OCIP-provided coverage.

The contractor also should ask the OCIP Administrator for a complete breakdown of the eventual OCIP deduct and should be prepared to challenge an excessive deduction.

The OCIP enrollment process, the submission of monthly insurance-related information such as payrolls, and the OCIP deduct review process can impose a significant administrative cost on the contractor. It is unlikely that the owner will agree to compensate the contractor for these additional costs.

The timing of the OCIP deduct process also may cause problems. The OCIP deduct is usually taken though owner-issued deductive change orders. The initial OCIP deduct may be applied to a single progress payment, which may significantly reduce a month’s cash flow. The OCIP deduct process also affects change orders. The owner generally will request that the contractor provide additive change orders with insurance costs included. When the additive changes orders are numerous or constitute a large dollar volume, the OCIP deduct process for change orders may be slow. The owner will hold final payment until the OCIP Administrator can calculate the total amount of the deduct for change orders.

An OCIP also eliminates the contractor’s markup on insurance costs. While this is a desirable benefit to the owner, it deprives the contractor of any compensation for insurance-related administrative costs.


What Is Covered?

OCIPs usually provide worker’s compensation/employer’s liability, general liability (CGL) and builder’s risk coverage. The coverage has two basic limitations: (1) coverage is restricted to activities at the project site; and (2) coverage, with certain limitations, ends upon completion of the project. Coverage for “completed operations” generally continues after the project ends. This “tail” may be for 3, 5 or 10 years. In an effort to maximize cost savings, the owner may select a less expensive policy, which leaves the contractor at risk after project completion. The contractor should be wary of “modified occurrence” type policies that provide coverage only for claims made during the policy year. Also, it is important to confirm that there is “completed operations” CGL coverage. Further, certain policies may only provide “completed operations” coverage for a limited time period, such as for 3 or 5 years after project completion. If this period is less than 10 years, there may be uninsured exposure to liability for construction defects because such actions may be brought for up to 10 years after completion of the project, particularly for latent defects.


What Is Not Covered?

OCIP coverage should be reviewed to determine whether it is as broad as needed to replace the contractor’s existing policies. The existing policies must be maintained because off-site work incidental to the project is not covered by most OCIP programs. Warranty work and call-backs also generally are not covered after completion of the project.


Conclusion

OCIPs are here to stay. For project owners and developers, OCIPs may bring real benefits in the form of cost savings. These cost savings, to some extent, are counterbalanced by increased administrative costs and exposure to risk. For contractors and subcontractors, OCIPs can be survived. It is important to carefully review the coverage provided by the OCIP and to manage the method by which insurance costs are deducted to ensure that the process accurately reflects the true cost of insurance.


Department of Insurance Lic. No. OE61911
19126 Cantara Street Reseda, CA. 91335