How To Get A General Liability Insurance Quote

1 comment

Posted on 30th August 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , ,

Finding a business insurance agency

There are several ways to go about getting business insurance for a construction company. The internet is becoming ever more popular for consumers of all types. The construction industry is no different from the rest of the marketplace: It too has turned to the internet when shopping for anything from material, equipment, a labor force to business insurance. The first thing a contractor needs to do is locate a business insurance broker via an online search. Contact a broker who specializes in contractors insurance. Complete the online contact form and wait for a call back. In fact, I suggest you do this with several sites that all specialize in construction insurance or business insurance in general. I found that if you contact several business insurance agencies you may only get a call back from one or two agents. This is the starting point because you don’t want to work with a broker who received a lead and was too lazy to bother to call back or at the very least send an email back.

Once the initial contact is made the client needs to speak to the representative and asses if he or she feels comfortable working with that particular person. A consumer should check with the BBB and the Department of Insurance to make sure that there are no complaints against the insurance agency. A consumer should also consider who they are talking to when they contact the insurance agency. Do they get a receptionist transferring to a voicemail each time or do they speak to a licensed agent each time. How accessible is the person that you will be working with on a regular basis. Customers don’t like leaving voicemails especially when they don’t get responded to. These are all things a consumer must take into consideration when choosing a business insurance agency.

Some advice for consumers

Once the consumer has chosen the business insurance agency he or she should discuss all of the business insurance needs that they have as a package. You as a consumer may not know about some great package that the broker might have available so give the agent as much information as possible so he or she can offer you the products and services that best suit your needs. Any agent that request that you complete long forms and application is not providing good service. If you have to complete the applications what are they doing? This is a service that most insurance agents offer as a part of the marketing process. I always cringe when I see a lengthy online application. If I can avoid it, I do. A good broker will take your basic information, complete all the required applications and submit it to various insurance companies that have an appetite for your type of business.

Last but not least don’t spread it too thin.

Once you start the shopping process don’t go to multiple brokers. If you go to multiple brokers you will likely cause delays in getting a quote. What consumers don’t know is that once a broker gets a quote on your behalf that market is blocked for any other broker. So in essence once a quote is issued any other brokers approaching that market will be turned away or asked to provide a broker of record letter from the applicant releasing the same quote for a second time. If you are shopping with two brokers you should know where each one plans on submitting to so that work is not duplicated. The brokers will appreciate your honesty, the agents job will be easier if they have all the facts and he or she is likely to be able to get you a better price on your business insurance if they know all the facts and what they are competing against.

Need assistance with contractors insurance

Contractors Insurance Requirements Delay Gulf Oil Clean Up Efforts

3 comments

Posted on 30th August 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , , , , ,

The Problem

There are tons of out of work contractors that are able, ready and willing to assist in the Gulf Coast Cleanup efforts. So what is stopping these contractors from getting out there and doing the work? Apparently, the rigid contractors insurance requirements that are being requested are the problem for most contractors. Contractors must purchase third party liability also knows as general liability that covers them for this type of work. They must also purchase and maintain a pollution liability insurance policy. Contractors are also federally mandated to purchase and maintain workers compensation insurance coverage for employees that are working on, near or around waterways. These ridged contractors insurance requirements slow down the process of getting contractors started on the cleanup efforts.

Not only is it difficult for a lot of the contractors to locate business insurance brokers that know how to handle this type of account, once a contractor has located a good business insurance broker that he feels comfortable with that broker has to be paid. For contractors with several employees and a reasonable amount of annual gross sales these polices can get quite expensive due to the nature of the operation being preformed. Don’t forget oil cleanup is not exactly the same as residential remodeling work or home building projects. There is a lot more risk from the insurance company’s point of view: The higher the risk, the higher the rate. Many small to mid size contractors are having difficulties paying the initial down payment to get the coverage bound.

There is no dispute that the more quickly the oil spill is cleaned the more quickly the Gulf Coast economy will recover and less likely our beautiful wetlands and beaches will be soiled. Also, don’t forget that every day that is being wasted means more ocean and marine life will get destroyed and the environmental impact is allowed to continue to grow

The Solution

Contractors need to find a commercial insurance broker that specializes in hard to place risks and contractors insurance at the same time. A broker that deals with contractors insurance on a daily basis should have markets available that have pollution liability insurance, general liability insurance and workers compensation insurance that satisfy the federal governments’ rigid requirements.

In Conclusion

There is no dispute that the more quickly the oil spill is cleaned the more quickly the Gulf Coast economy will recover and less likely our beautiful wetlands and beaches will be soiled. Also, don’t forget that every day that is being wasted means more ocean and marine life will get destroyed and the environmental impact is allowed to continue to grow.

California and Nevada Contractors Make Employees Become Independant Contractors In An Attemp Get Cheap Contractors Insurance Costs

0 comments

Posted on 30th August 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , , , , ,

Contractors are trying to save money on their contractors insurance by making their employees independent contractors. Contractors cannot afford their general liability insurance and workers compensation insurance in this economic environment when they are finding it difficult to stay in business all together. The bottom line is that both general liability insurance and workers compensation insurance become more expensive as the contractor has more employees and the annual salaries increase. It is much more cost effective for the contractor to make his employees go out and get licensed by the Contractors State License Board themselves. Once the employee obtains a contractors license he can now be considered an independent contractor.

Lower insurance premiums for general liability insurance

Now that the employee is considered an independent contractor the general contactor’s general liability policy no longer covers the work of the independent contractor. However, this means that the general contractor no longer has to claim the newly independent contractors annual pay as salaries. This brings the cost of the general liability insurance down substantially. This money can now be listed as subcontracting costs in stead of salaries which is cheaper from a premium stand point.

Lower insurance premiums for workers compensation insurance

The other benefit to the general contractor who changes his employees to independent contractors is that the contractor no longer has to pay for workers compensation insurance for that particular person. The independent contractor is now listed as exempt from workers compensation unless he hires employees. But as long as the independent contactor has no employees or helpers no workers compensation insurance is needed. The general contractor no longer has to pay workers compensation insurance premium on this individual nor does he have any liability over an injury that occurs on the job.

Great for the general contractor – not so great for the independent contractor

This situation is terrific for the general contractor. First, the general contractor no longer has to cover the employees work or the employee against work injuries. The second benefit is that the general contractor also avoids having to pay parole taxes to the state and federal government. However, for the new independent contractor this means a lot of changes that are not exactly beneficial to him. First, he will now have to purchase general liability insurance of his own. The independent contractor no longer has coverage if he is injured on the job. From a tax stand point the independent contractor will not have a check back from employee taxes that were withheld from his paycheck all year long. In fact, most of the time the independent contactor will have to pay tax on the his profits. The bottom line is that changing an employee to an independent contractor is beneficial to the employer and not to the employee.

Need assistance with contractors insurance Califronia, or contractors insurance Nevada



Contractors Insurance – Beware of prices that are too good to be true.

2 comments

Posted on 25th August 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , , ,

As the economic climate becomes more hostile towards remodeling contractors and new home builders the need to save money on contractor’s insurance coverage increases. However, contractors need to be well aware of what it is they might be giving up to get that low price. Insurance brokers have several ways of lowering the cost of your contractor’s insurance costs. However, they are also lowering coverages and thereby the level of protection that your business has against claims for property damage, bodily injury, construction defect, or any other claim that might arise.

In this article I will introduce the concept of the sunset clause, the manifestation clause and the money saving risk retention group policy. These are three options that may save you a bundle of money now but can cost you your business later. Unfortunately, when competing for the sale some insurance brokers are willing to sell you anything just to get the business. Always ask your insurance broker if the policy you are purchasing contains one or both of these clauses or if it is being offered by a risk retention group.

The sunset clause limits the time that a claim can be filed after the policy expiration date. For example, a general contractor has liability over his operations for ten years after the projects completion. A sunset clause would limit the ability to file a claim to however many years the clause stipulates. So a policy with a three year sunset clause would limit the insurance company’s liability to the said amount of time. That does not mean that the general contractor is absolved of the liability for the remainder of the ten year term. The contractor is still responsible no matter what deal he cut with his insurance company.

The manifestation clause limits claims to be filed within the policy year or a short time thereafter. The manifestation clause says that the damage being claimed had to have manifested itself or shown itself to the average person during the time of the policy or the stipulated time period. If the damage was not seen or noticed during the designated time period the claim will not be covered. Again, this leaves the contractor holding the bag for any damages that he may be liable for.

The sunset clause and manifestation clause can be written into the policy separately or together. Used alone or together the insurance company limits their liability so severely that the policy becomes virtually worthless. All this for a savings of usually just a few % of the annual premium.

The third way that insurance brokers sneak one over on the client in an unethical attempt to get the lowest quote possible is with a policy offered by a risk retention group. I don’t care how safe your insurance broker told you risk retention groups are they are not safe at all. Purchasing your insurance coverage from a risk retention group is not a financially sound decision. There are several issues with Risk Retention Groups. The two that I find most dangerous are a) the fact that they are not under the authority of any State Department of Insurance and b) there is no guarantee of funds being available in case of a claim. There is no remedy for the insured if the company is dissolved. These are not minor problems if you ask me. The fact that RRG’s are not under State DOI authority lends them to playing by their own rules often times. I have seen this in the underwriting stage, in the policy servicing stage and in the claim process. Even when an insured files a complaint with the DOI, the RRG cannot be compelled to act. Once a business buys this type of coverage they are opening up a can of worms that may very well come back to haunt them.

While there are several safe ways to save money on your business insurance these are not some of the ways that I would recommend. Although I am addressing contractors in this article this information is important to anyone who is purchasing business insurance no matter what their industry. Ask your broker to put all the terms, conditions and exclusions of the policy that you are about to purchase in writing on a formal proposal. Make sure to read the entire proposal and make it a point to understand the insurance proposal thoroughly. If there is any part of it that you do not understand take the time to ask your broker. That is what he or she is there for. Also, make sure that the name and rating of the insurance company is noted on the proposal. This will enable you to make sure that you are purchasing coverage from a reputable carrier that has a good reputation and is going to stand behind you and your business at the moment of truth. If you still don’t feel like you are getting the coverages you need for a reasonable price shop around. Call a broker that specializes in the type of coverage that you are looking for. It is your right as a consumer to get the best coverage that your money can buy.

Need assistance with your California contractors insurance or Nevada contractors insurance ?

Contractor’s Insurance: Builder’s Risk vs. Course of Construction

1 comment

Posted on 14th August 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , , , ,

Contractors insurance and business insurance in general can be a bit complicated.   A common question regarding contractors insurance is wheather builders risk and course of construction the are same thing? The answer is absolutely not.  Builders risk covers property only.  It can be written for a specific project or as a blanket.  It can also cover building materials before they become a part of the structure or while they are in transit.
 
Course of Construction on the other hand is a more general term used by contractors.  It can include builders risk as a part of it.  However, it usually refers to premises liability for a construction project.  The course of construction policy is usually meant to protect the property owner from liability claims as it is assumed that the general contractor on the project has contractors insurance for his business.  In fact, most course of construction and builders risk policies require that the general contractor and all the subcontractors have their own contractor’s insurance coverage in place.
 
If you would like more information on the subject I would advise that you call an insurance broker that specializes in contractors insurance coverages.

All Contractor’s Must Have Contractor’s Insurance

0 comments

Posted on 14th August 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , , ,

Why Do All Contractors Need To Have Contractors Insurance Coverage?
 
Being a business insurance broker many people have asked me if contractor’s need to have contractor’s insurance.  The answer is yes, for several reasons.  Hiring a contractor without contractor’s insurance can save you some money now but can end up costing you thousands later on down the road.  The money you might save on hiring an uninsured contractor may not pay off in the long run. 
 
The first and most obvious reason is to cover the contractor against defective construction law suits.  One such law suite can completely destroy a construction business.  If you are a homeowner or property owner you want to make sure that you have remedy in case the construction if faulty and you have to have the work repaired or rebuilt in the future.
 
The other reason it is a good idea to hire an insured contractor is that like any other business a contractor is responsible for any damages or bodily injury that may have been caused due to the products or completed operation of the business.  Let’s face it, accidents happen.  What if an accident happens to take place on a job site?  Who is responsible?  Is it the property owner or the contractor or perhaps it’s the tenant that is the responsible party?  Now we are really asking whose negligence caused the accident.  Either way it is likely that all three parties will be brought into such a law suite.  If the tenant and the property owner hired an insured contractor and obtained an additional insured certificate naming them and referencing the project they are in luck because in such case the contractor’s insurance company will pay to defend all three parties.  They will only pay out on such a claim if it is found that the contractor was the negligent party.  However, they will pay for the legal defense of all three parties.  Of course they are on the contractor’s side and it is in the insurance companies benefit to have the contractor found not to be the responsible party.  The property owner and tenant might still want to pay for their own legal representation in some cases.
 
One more point to keep in mind is that a contractor’s insurance policy covers that particular construction company’s products and completed operation: It does not cover the subcontractors that are hired by the general contractor. Each subcontractor must have his own insurance to cover his operations.
 
If you would like more information on the subject I would advise that you call an insurance broker that specializes in contractor’s insurance coverages and not just any business insurance agency.

Owner Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIPs): Why Owners Like Them and Why Contractors May Not

9 comments

Posted on 19th July 2010 by admin in Business Insurance |Contractors Insurance

, , , ,

Wrap-Up policies AKA Owner Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIPs) are becoming a standard feature in the construction insurance industry. Insurance brokers have heavily marketed OCIPs to owners, promising cost savings.

The programs, initially, are simple and attractive. The project owner buys insurance for all the participants in a construction project. The owner then requires the participants to reduce their price by eliminating all of their insurance costs in exchange for owner-provided coverage. The owner expects to save money by discount-purchasing of insurance and by avoiding contractor markups on contractors insurance costs. A single insurance carrier on the risk for claims can result in more efficient and less expensive claim resolution.  One carrier for all the projects needs is also easier to deal with from an administrative point of view as opposed to multiple policies. This promise is what sells Wrap-Up policy.

In reality this policy is way more complicated than it appears initially. General contractors and subcontractors need to be cautious when participating in an OCIP project. They must ensure that the coverage offered by the OCIP is sufficient to replace their existing insurance coverage. They also must be careful that the “bid deduct” process by which the cost of insurance is deducted from their price is properly and timely performed.

Each OCIP is designed for a specific owner’s needs for a specific project. The following overview of OCIPs is based on general practices. The OCIP documents must be carefully reviewed and considered for each project.


What Is A Wrap- Up Policy AKA Owner Controlled Insurance Program?

In an OCIP, the owner purchases insurance for other participants in a construction project. OCIPs also are sometimes called “wrap-ups.” An OCIP will cover the owner, contractor and subcontractors. An OCIP also may include design professionals. The coverage can include general liability insurance (CGL), builder’s risk, worker’s compensation insurance, design errors and omissions as well as excess, umbrella and other special coverages.

The coverage provided by an OCIP is summarized in a document known as the “OCIP Manual.” The OCIP Manual also should describe the bid-deduct process, claims management and safety requirements. This important document should be made a part of any bid solicitation and of ultimate contract documents. The “OCIP Administrator” administers the OCIP program. The OCIP Administrator acts as an agent of the owner and usually is supplied by the broker that set up the OCIP Program.

Those who benefit from the OCIP must give the owner credit for this insurance coverage. This is the bid deduct process. There are two basic methods for the bid deduct process. In one, the owner can ask that all interested contractors and subcontractors provide a price for the work which excludes insurance. Each proposal must be reviewed by the OCIP Administrator to determine whether the price accurately reflects the elimination of contractor insurance costs. This can be a time-consuming process. In the second approach, all interested contractors and subcontractors are asked to submit proposals that include insurance costs. When the contract is awarded, the OCIP Administrator will calculate a deductive change order for the successful contractor’s and subcontractors’ insurance costs. This second method, which appears to be more popular, requires that only successful proposals be reviewed for a deduction of insurance costs.

Public and private owners first began to use OICPs on large-scale projects ($100 million or more). The use of OCIPs on smaller projects ($50 million or more) is increasing as owner, broker and insurer expertise with OCIPs grows. On smaller projects, the additional administrative cost generally makes it less worthwhile to use OCIPs.

But, there is an exception. Owners and developers have begun to use OCIPs for construction of condominium and other multi-residential projects, even those costing less than $50 million. Defect claims by homeowner associations have plagued such projects for decades and have made it extremely difficult to insure such construction. Many contractors and subcontractors are unable to insure these projects at almost any price. The answer is the OCIP. It may be the only way such a project can be constructed in today’s insurance market.


Why Would a Project Owner Choose an OCIP?

Traditionally, an owner accepts the economic risk of a project but seeks to avoid the construction risk. An owner typically would retain a design team or a design-build contractor to be responsible for design and a general contractor or design-build contractor to be responsible for constructing the project for a fixed price or a guaranteed maximum price. An owner-developer also would use surety bonds, insurance and contractual indemnity provisions to further insulate itself from construction risk.

An OCIP changes this approach. The owner becomes responsible for insuring the project and for administering loss prevention programs and becomes exposed to the risk of increased premiums for unexpected losses. In exchange for this new risk, the owner hopes to obtain cost savings.


The Pro’s of purchasing an OCIP

Cost savings are the primary advantage of an OCIP. The owner-developer always indirectly bears the cost of insurance on a construction project. The design consultants, contractor, subcontractors and other parties involved in the project, in pricing their work, pass through the cost of insurance plus a markup. Insurers and brokers assert that an owner can save from 0.5 to 2 percent of total construction costs by using an OCIP. The savings come from: (1) the elimination of contractor mark-up on insurance costs; and (2) the ability to obtain insurance at a lower cost than contractors, subcontractors and others can obtain it.

An OCIP also can provide increased coverage limits. The typical contractor or subcontractor has liability coverage in the $1 million to $2 million range. OCIP liability limits may be $5 million for primary coverage, with additional excess coverage. OCIP coverage may be broader than that available to contractors. In some cases, such as condominium projects, contractors may not be able to obtain coverage at all. OCIP coverage also is uniform. While contractors and subcontractors usually provide certificates of insurance evidencing coverage limits, the specific endorsements and limitations of their particular policies may not be disclosed. It also is possible that a contractor’s or subcontractor’s policy limits have been depleted by payments on claims on other projects.

A key part of OCIPs is a uniform risk management program. The OCIP Administrator has overall responsibility for safety and loss control on the project. The OCIP Administrator also will handle claims. This centralized management, in theory, can result in cost savings from improved safety, increased loss control and more efficient claims handling.


The Disadvantages of an OCIP

The promise of cost savings may be illusory. Administration of an OCIP will impose new, additional costs on the owner. The owner, through its OCIP Administrator, becomes responsible for safety and claims management on the project. The OCIP Administrator will need to administer the bid-deduct process. The actual experience of owners suggests that the promised cost savings of an OCIP may not always be fully realized.

The insurance premium/loss risk is shifted from the contractor and subcontractors to the owner. The owner may be exposed to the risk of premium increases if labor costs and loss experiences exceed estimates. But, it also is possible that an owner will benefit from premium rebates if claims are less than anticipated.

Under an OCIP, it may be more difficult to manage the performance of contractors and subcontractors that have insurance-related claims. For example, a subcontractor with an insurance claim for damaged work may wait for the owner’s OCIP Administrator to settle the claim before repairing the work. It may be more difficult for the owner to enforce contractual obligations to repair the work and proceed before disputes are resolved when the subcontractor asserts that the owner’s OCIP Administrator is delaying adjustment of the claim.

An OCIP also may discourage bidders. Contractors and subcontractors may be hesitant to bid on the project because they are unfamiliar with OCIPs. Potential bidders may have concerns about unfair calculations of credits for insurance costs during the bid deduct process, about uncompensated overhead resulting from new administrative responsibilities for the OCIP and about loss of mark-up on insurance costs.

What Coverage’s Does an OCIP Provide?

Who is covered?

OCIP coverage will include the owner and the general contractor. Coverage also will include subcontractors but may limit coverage to subcontractors with contract values over a certain amount, such as $25,000. In that case, subcontractors with contracts for less than $25,000 should be required to provide certificates of insurance. Coverage also may be limited to those providing direct labor to the construction site. Therefore, material suppliers typically are not covered. “Furnish and Install” subcontractors that furnish materials but that subcontract out installation also may not be covered.


What is covered?

OCIP coverage will be tailored specifically to the project. In general, coverage will include worker’s compensation/employer’s liability, general liability (CGL) and builder’s risk property insurance. Coverage generally is limited to operations at the project site during construction. The OCIP typically will not provide coverage for off-site operations, including work and transportation, and for post-completion on-site work, such as warranty work. Accordingly, contractors and subcontractors must be required to provide proof of insurance by their own carriers for non-covered activities.

OCIP programs also offer excess or umbrella coverage. Less commonly, an OCIP will provide for design errors and omissions coverage. Such coverage is included when the design professionals are included in OCIP coverage. Such coverage, however, also will be necessary for contractors to the extent that any portion of their scope is design-build.

OCIP coverage generally does not include surety bonds. An OCIP may include subcontractor default insurance, however.


Contract Issues

The existence of an OCIP does not eliminate the need to provide for contractual indemnity by the contractor. An owner should include a broad indemnity clause in the construction contract as a second basis of protection from loss.

If the construction contract provides for alternative dispute resolution, such as arbitration, the owner-developer should seek to bind the broker/OCIP Administrator and insurance company with the same provision. This will ensure that all necessary parties will be involved in any insurance-related dispute. If the broker and/or insurer refuse to agree to ADR, the owner should consider deleting the ADR provision from the construction contract.


What an OCIP Means to the General Contractor and Subcontractors

When an owner implements an OCIP, participation is mandatory for the contractor and subcontractors. While OCIPs often are touted as having benefits, these benefits usually accrue to the owner. An OCIP imposes real risks to and expenses on contractors and subcontractors, and they must be carefully managed.

The contractor must carefully review the OCIP Manual before submitting pricing. OCIPs commonly require the contractor to submit pricing with the cost of insurance included. The contractor then must complete an OCIP Enrollment Form to become eligible for the OCIP. Once the OCIP insurance is issued, the cost of the contractor’s insurance is deducted from the contractor’s pricing.


The Benefits of an OCIP to a General Contractor or Subcontractor

An OCIP may provide greater limits for primary and excess or umbrella coverage than the contractor’s or the subcontractors’ regular policy. This may prove beneficial in resolving defect claims. In addition, because a single carrier insures all of the participants in a project, claims resolution may be easier.

An OCIP also may allow a contractor to engage in work that it may not otherwise be able to obtain. Many contractors and subcontractors cannot take work involving multi-family residential structures. Such projects have been plagued by claims and lawsuits for years, and as a result, such work usually is excluded from insurance coverage. An OCIP provided by the owner-developer may be the only way a condominium project can be constructed with insurance.


The Disadvantages of an OCIP to a General Contractor or Subcontractor

The three major disadvantages of an OCIP are: (1) possible gaps in coverage; (2) OCIP deductions that exceed actual insurance cost savings, and (3) uncompensated administrative costs.

The prudent contractor must do more than review the OCIP Manual for a summary of the coverage provided. The contractor should request copies of the OCIP policies and have the policies reviewed by the contractor’s broker or attorney for the coverage they offer. This is especially true for general liability and builder’s risk policies, which can vary significantly between policies. Critical liability insurance issues include whether the policy provides “broad form” coverage, how long the “completed operations” coverage continues and what exclusions are included.

The contractor must carefully review and complete the OCIP Enrollment Form. The format of OCIP Enrollment Forms varies. The form must be carefully scrutinized to ensure that it allows the contractor to show its true cost of insurance. If all discounts and credits are not reflected, the OCIP deduct will exceed the true cost of the insurance.

If the contractor has any flat-rate premiums, this should be carefully noted. The OCIP deduct should not include any flat-rate premiums because the contractor is unlikely to receive credit from its insurer for the OCIP-provided coverage.

The contractor also should ask the OCIP Administrator for a complete breakdown of the eventual OCIP deduct and should be prepared to challenge an excessive deduction.

The OCIP enrollment process, the submission of monthly insurance-related information such as payrolls, and the OCIP deduct review process can impose a significant administrative cost on the contractor. It is unlikely that the owner will agree to compensate the contractor for these additional costs.

The timing of the OCIP deduct process also may cause problems. The OCIP deduct is usually taken though owner-issued deductive change orders. The initial OCIP deduct may be applied to a single progress payment, which may significantly reduce a month’s cash flow. The OCIP deduct process also affects change orders. The owner generally will request that the contractor provide additive change orders with insurance costs included. When the additive changes orders are numerous or constitute a large dollar volume, the OCIP deduct process for change orders may be slow. The owner will hold final payment until the OCIP Administrator can calculate the total amount of the deduct for change orders.

An OCIP also eliminates the contractor’s markup on insurance costs. While this is a desirable benefit to the owner, it deprives the contractor of any compensation for insurance-related administrative costs.


What Is Covered?

OCIPs usually provide worker’s compensation/employer’s liability, general liability (CGL) and builder’s risk coverage. The coverage has two basic limitations: (1) coverage is restricted to activities at the project site; and (2) coverage, with certain limitations, ends upon completion of the project. Coverage for “completed operations” generally continues after the project ends. This “tail” may be for 3, 5 or 10 years. In an effort to maximize cost savings, the owner may select a less expensive policy, which leaves the contractor at risk after project completion. The contractor should be wary of “modified occurrence” type policies that provide coverage only for claims made during the policy year. Also, it is important to confirm that there is “completed operations” CGL coverage. Further, certain policies may only provide “completed operations” coverage for a limited time period, such as for 3 or 5 years after project completion. If this period is less than 10 years, there may be uninsured exposure to liability for construction defects because such actions may be brought for up to 10 years after completion of the project, particularly for latent defects.


What Is Not Covered?

OCIP coverage should be reviewed to determine whether it is as broad as needed to replace the contractor’s existing policies. The existing policies must be maintained because off-site work incidental to the project is not covered by most OCIP programs. Warranty work and call-backs also generally are not covered after completion of the project.


Conclusion

OCIPs are here to stay. For project owners and developers, OCIPs may bring real benefits in the form of cost savings. These cost savings, to some extent, are counterbalanced by increased administrative costs and exposure to risk. For contractors and subcontractors, OCIPs can be survived. It is important to carefully review the coverage provided by the OCIP and to manage the method by which insurance costs are deducted to ensure that the process accurately reflects the true cost of insurance.


Who Should Purchase A Builders Risk Policy?

3 comments

Posted on 1st July 2010 by admin in Contractors Insurance

, , , , , ,

When buying contractors insurance contractors and project owner alike want to know who should purchase a builders risk policy.  Some points to be considered are:

  • Are your materials covered while in transit and temporary storage?  If so, how much?
  • How are you going to insure your business profit and overhead on the job?
  • Where you going to obtain coverages for your scaffolding and construction forms?
  • Can you be certain the coverage is actually in force? 
  • Will the policy cover collapse or theft of building materials before they are permanently attached? 

The answers to the above questions are probably going to be unfavorable.  This is why we recommend that our builder clients carry the Builders Risk policy instead of allowing the homeowner to set it up.

 Source:  Jon Fritinger/Great American Insurance and Sadler & Company, Inc.

Homeowner’s Policy Didn’t Cover Chinese Drywall Damage

0 comments

Posted on 1st July 2010 by admin in Contractors Insurance

A federal judge has ruled that a homeowner’s insurance policy does not have to pay for damages caused by faulty Chinese drywall.  With Chinese drywall continuing to be a concern for homeowners, the judge’s ruling could affect how thousands of lawsuits by homeowners will be settled.

The judge based his decision on the exclusion within the homeowner’s policy which excludes damage caused by latent defect, faulty materials, corrosion, and pollution.  With this exclusion, the policy would not cover removing or replacing the faulty drywall or any subsequent damages.

Needless to say this decision sets an unfavorable precedent for homeowners.

Source:  Insurance Journal

Chinese Drywall Problems Are Huge

1 comment

Posted on 25th June 2010 by admin in Contractors Insurance

“The property loss from Chinese drywall could exceed every U.S. hurricane except Katrina and Andrew”. 

The complaints received by the Consumer Products Safety Commission show that the impact of Chinese drywall will be widespread.  Between 2004-2006, an estimated 500 million pounds of tainted drywall came into the United States.  It is quite possible that the tainted drywall is now in more than 100,000 homes.  The tainted drywall supplies have affected all but 12 states, with the greatest problems occurring in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Virginia. 

“Based on $80 per square foot (the lowest cost from the verdicts made public) in 100,000 homes with an average of 2,200 square feet per house, the loss would be $18 billion in property damage”. 

The damaging health effects of having to live with the drywall have not been discussed, but the potential for property damage/claims alone are catastrophic. 

Source:  http://www.iiaba.net/IAMag/NewsViews/052010.html